http://www.richardcleaver.com/2009/10/21/age-by-chocolate/ the journey Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:14:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 http://www.richardcleaver.com/2009/10/21/age-by-chocolate/comment-page-1/#comment-48029 Bryan Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:12:07 +0000 http://www.richardcleaver.com/?p=3347#comment-48029 It is amazing. However, you can use the same formula for the previous years/coming years from step 5 (1758/1759 + or - 1). E.g: If the year that you are calculating is 2010, then, you should use 1760 or 1759 in step 5. It is amazing. However, you can use the same formula for the previous years/coming years from step 5 (1758/1759 + or – 1). E.g: If the year that you are calculating is 2010, then, you should use 1760 or 1759 in step 5.

]]>